nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
您当前所在位置: 首页> 文献列表> 城乡交错带特征识别与空间演变研究——以哈尔滨市为例
2025, 10, v.23 33-45
城乡交错带特征识别与空间演变研究——以哈尔滨市为例
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金面上项目“基于社会-生态系统分析框架的黑土区农田土地退化特征及适应性生态修复研究——以宾县为例”(41971217)
邮箱(Email): 1214564348@qq.com;
DOI:
投稿时间: 2025-03-06
投稿日期(年): 2025
修回时间: 2025-04-16
终审时间: 2025-04-17
终审日期(年): 2025
审稿周期(年): 1
发布时间: 2025-10-28
出版时间: 2025-10-28
移动端阅读
摘要:

城乡交错带是城乡要素流通的前沿空间,具有复杂的人地关系特征。为科学识别城乡交错带并揭示其动态演变规律,研究以哈尔滨市为研究区,基于土地利用数据构建信息熵模型,并结合中心引力集聚法,精准识别了近40年(1980-2020年)哈尔滨市城乡交错带的演变过程。研究结果表明:哈尔滨市城乡交错带呈现出明显的圈层形态,其空间演变特征可概括为“低速蔓延—跳跃扩张—内部分异”三个阶段。通过稳定、扩张、退化三种类型的城乡交错带划分,进一步揭示了其规模演变的动态特征。此外,参考以往研究,对城乡交错带的功能空间进行了定位与可视化分析,发现其主导功能由早期的“生产—生态复合”功能逐步向“生产—生活—生态”协调功能过渡。基于研究结果与哈尔滨市社会经济发展背景,提出城乡交错带演变的驱动因素主要包括经济驱动、政策驱动与环境驱动。根据演变特征,哈尔滨市城乡交错带的发展可划分为三个阶段:缓慢孕育期(1980-1990年),城乡要素微弱发展,空间扩张缓慢;快速发展期(1990-2010年),城市扩张显著,城乡交错带快速向城市偏移;稳定重构期(2010-2020年),城乡要素趋于协调,城乡一体化发展与空间重构逐步实现。创新点在于通过长时序土地利用数据与信息熵模型相结合,精准识别了城乡交错带的动态演变过程,并揭示了其功能转型与驱动机制,为未来国土空间规划与城乡一体化发展提供了科学依据。

Abstract:

The urban-rural fringe serves as a critical frontier for the circulation of urban and rural elements, characterized by complex human-land interactions.To scientifically identify the urban-rural fringe and reveal its dynamic evolution patterns, this study takes Harbin City as the research area and constructs an information entropy model based on land use data, combined with the central gravitational agglomeration method, to further accurately delineate the evolution of the urban-rural fringe over the past 40 years(1980-2020).The results indicate that the urban-rural fringe of Harbin exhibits a distinct concentric structure, with its spatial evolution is characterized by three stages: “low-speed expansion—leapfrog expansion—internal differentiation.”By classifying the urban-rural fringe into stable, expanding, and degrading types, the study further reveals the dynamic characteristics of its scale evolution.Additionally, drawing on previous research, this study spatially locates and visualizes the functional evolution of the urban-rural fringe, showing a transition from a production-ecological composite function to a coordinated production-living-ecological function.Based on the findings and the socioeconomic context of Harbin, the driving factors of the urban-rural fringe evolution are identified as economic, policy, and environmental drivers.The evolution of Harbin's urban-rural fringe can be divided into three stages: the slow gestation period(1980-1990),characterized by weak urban-rural interactions and slow spatial expansion; the rapid development period(1990-2010),marked by significant urban expansion and rapid outward shift of the urban-rural fringe; and the stable reconstruction period(2010-2020).During this period urban-rural elements became more coordinated, and integrated development and spatial restructuring were gradually achieved.The innovation of this study lies in the integration of long-term land use data with the information entropy model, enabling precise identification of the dynamic evolution of the urban-rural fringe and revealing its functional transformation and driving mechanisms.This research provides a scientific basis for future territorial spatial planning and integrated urban-rural development.

参考文献

[1 ] 陈佑启.城乡交错带名辩[J].地理学与国土研究,1995,11(01):47-52.

[2 ] 陈佑启.试论城乡交错带及其特征与功能[J].经济地理,1996,16(03):27-31.

[3 ] Cheng Z,Wang H,Wang L,et al.Mix leading to success?Exploring the innovative development model in peri-urban China[J].Habitat International,2018,82:1-8.

[4 ] 彭建,马晶,袁媛.城市边缘带识别研究进展与展望[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(08):1068-1077.

[5 ] Krueger R R,Bryfogle R C.Urban Problems:A Canadian Reader[M].Holt McDougal,1971.

[6 ] Webster D.On the edge:Shaping the future of peri-urban East Asia[M].Stanford:Asia/Pacific Research Center,2002.

[7 ] 许鑫,隆玲.城市边缘区研究综述[J].知识经济,2012,14(08):63-65.

[8 ] 顾朝林.中国大城市边缘区研究[M].科学出版社,1995.

[9 ] 钱建平,周勇,杨信廷.基于遥感和信息熵的城乡结合部范围界定——以荆州市为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2007,16(04):451-455.

[10 ] 王秀兰,李雪瑞,冯仲科.基于TM 影像的北京城市边缘带范围界定方法研究[J].遥感信息,2010,25(04):100-104,134.

[11 ] 周小驰,刘咏梅,杨海娟.西安市城市边缘区空间识别与边界划分[J].地球信息科学学报,2017,19(10):1327-1335.

[12 ] 戴俊杰,董婧雯,杨晟,等.基于空间突变特征的城市边缘区提取方法[J].地球信息科学学报,2021,23(08):1401-1421.

[13 ] 琚青青,尹菡怿,李微,等.海口市城市边缘区空间范围的识别研究[J].海南大学学报:自然科学版,2019,37(02):180-185.

[14 ] 马晶,李全,应玮.基于小波变换的武汉市城乡边缘带识别[J].武汉大学学报·信息科学版,2016,41(02):235-241.

[15 ] 王媛,姜博,初楠臣,等.基于建设用地变化的城市边缘区提取方法与扩张模式研究——以哈尔滨市为例[J].经济地理,2016,36(05):26-32.

[16 ] 王海鹰,张新长,康停军,等.基于多准则判断的城市边缘区界定及其特征[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(04):703-714.

[17 ] 周浩,雷国平,张红梅,等.土地利用空间关联下城乡结合部边界界定方法研究[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(06):81-88.

[18 ] 曹辉,蒋伟萱,陈江龙,等.南京市城乡交错带多维识别与特征分析[J].自然资源学报,2023,38(03):795-807.

[19 ] Ravetz J,Fertner C,Nielsen T S.The dynamics of peri-urbanization[M]//Peri-urban futures:Scenarios and models for land use change in Europe.Berlin,Heidelberg:Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[20 ] Allen A.Environmental planning and management of the peri-urban interface:perspectives on an emerging field[J].Environment and urbanization,2003,15(01):135-148.

[21 ] Mortoja M G,Yigitcanlar T,Mayere S.What is the most suitable methodological approach to demarcate peri-urban areas?A systematic review of the literature[J].Land use policy,2020,95:104601

[22 ] Silva C.Auckland’s urban sprawl,policy ambiguities and the peri-urbanisation to Pukekohe[J].Urban Science,2018,3(01):1.

[23 ] Maheshwari B.,Thoradeniya B.,& Singh V P.(2016).Balanced urban development:options and strategies for liveable cities,Springer.26-38.

[24 ] Dadashpoor H.,Ahani S.,2021.Explaining objective forces,driving forces,and causal mechanisms affecting the formation and expansion of the peri-urban areas:a critical realism approach.Land Use Policy 102,105232.

[25 ] Ahani S.,Dadashpoor H.,2021.A review of domains,approaches,methods,and indicators in peri-urbanization literature.Habitat Int.114,102387.

[26 ] 陈佑启,杨鹏.国际上土地利用/土地覆盖变化研究的新进展[J].经济地理,2001,21(01):95-100.

[27 ] 王玉明,王瑞康.城市化时期郊区土地利用结构信息熵上升的原因[J].地理学报,2018,73(09):1647-1657.

[28 ] 黄琦,王宏志,顾江,等.城乡景观复杂度视角下的城乡交错带界限确定:以武汉市为例[J].经济地理,2019,39(10):71-77.

[29 ] 刘宝元,张甘霖,谢云,等.东北黑土区和东北典型黑土区的范围与划界[J].科学通报,2021,66(01):96-106.

[30 ] Wang X,Wang D,Lu J,et al.Identifying and tracking the urban-rural fringe evolution in the urban-rural transformation period:Evidence from a rapidly urbanized rust belt city in China[J].Ecological Indicators,2023,146:109856.

[31 ] 董婷,杨朝现,杨璇,等.基于“三生”功能协调的山地丘陵区土地综合整治分区——以重庆市江津区为例[J].农业资源与环境学报,2023,40(03):534-547

[32 ] 刘继来,刘彦随,李裕瑞.中国“三生空间”分类评价与时空格局分析[J].地理学报,2017,72(07):1290-1304.

[33 ] 崔家兴,顾江,孙建伟,等.湖北省三生空间格局演化特征分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(08):67-73.

[34 ] Fulman N,Grinblat Y,Benenson I.A project-based view of urban dynamics:Analyzing ‘leapfrogging’ and fringe development in Israel[J].Cities,2024,148:104908.

基本信息:

中图分类号:TU984.2

引用信息:

[1]宁静,马浩植,张雨林.城乡交错带特征识别与空间演变研究——以哈尔滨市为例[J].黑龙江国土资源,2025,23(10):33-45.

基金信息:

国家自然科学基金面上项目“基于社会-生态系统分析框架的黑土区农田土地退化特征及适应性生态修复研究——以宾县为例”(41971217)

投稿时间:

2025-03-06

投稿日期(年):

2025

修回时间:

2025-04-16

终审时间:

2025-04-17

终审日期(年):

2025

审稿周期(年):

1

发布时间:

2025-10-28

出版时间:

2025-10-28

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文
检 索 高级检索